Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal

Vol-05, Issue-03 (Jul-Sep 2026)

An International scholarly/ academic journal, peer-reviewed/ refereed journal, ISSN : 2959-1376

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Blended Learning Approach for Enriching Critical Thinking and Problem Solving in Undergraduate Students

Kundu, Kakali1 and Sarkar, Debabrata2

1Research Scholar, School of Education, Adamas University 

2Assistant Professor, School of Education, Adamas University, Kolkata

ORCiD: 0000-0002-1430-6049

Abstract

Blended Learning is an advanced and pioneering approach that transforms the teaching and learning dealing with technology and creates a more productive and cooperative setting. Current study inspects the effectiveness of the Blended Learning approach for undergraduate students. For the purpose of the study a comparative study between the traditional teaching learning approach and the Blended Learning approach has been adopted. The purpose of this study is to provide a clear idea about transformative potential of this approach in the context due to challenges faced in higher education. A quasi-experimental research design was adopted. 120 students were selected and selected students were divided into two groups (experimental and control groups). Firstly, the experimental group was getting treatment as taught Blended Learning approach and control group students didn’t received any kind of experimental training except traditional instruction. Pre-test and Post-test data was collected and analysed using statistical techniques. Results reviled that improvement in the academic performance for experimental group those who get the Blended Learning approach. It was recommended that the inclusion of the Blended Learning approach in education subjects may help the students for better academic performance and it will be very much beneficial for faculty members if they will get various faculty development programs for its implementation.

Keywords: Blended Learning, Undergraduate Student, Teaching and Learning, Academic Performance.

About Author

Kakali Kundu is presently working as a State Aided College Teacher at Rishi Bankim Chandra College for Women, Naihati, West Bengal with an experience of more than 15 years. She is experienced in the field of Educational Technology as well as Educational Statistics. She completed her masters in Education from Calcutta University. She has done her B.Ed. degree from Babasaheb Ambedkar Education University. She completed her M.Phil degree in Education subject. She has qualified both UGC NET, and SET in Education. She is presently pursuing her PhD degree in Education. She has presented different papers at different seminar/conferences, organised by reputed institutions, published chapter in edited books and peer reviewed journal.

Dr. Debabrata Sarkar is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Education at Adamas University, Kolkata. He holds a Ph.D. in Physical Education from Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya and is a National Fellowship holder through NTA UGC-NET. With over 20 research publications in national and international journals, his expertise spans Sports Training, Biomechanics, and Educational Policy making.

Impact Statement

This research study demonstrated that blended-learning approach has performed better performance than the traditional classroom in terms of sharpening critical thinking and improving problem-solving for undergraduate students. Experimental group students posted higher averages on post-tests than the control group. This suggests that blended learning teaching approaches helps close the gap between theory and hands-on work — like turning textbook diagrams into lab skills. Those gains showed up in both rural and urban schools, a reassuring sign that tech-supported learning can widen access to quality education. By encouraging active inquiry and practical digital know-how — the very abilities employers now prize — the model readies students for today’s challenges and makes a strong case for personalized, adaptive teaching. Who wouldn’t want that?

Cite this Article

APA Style (7th Edition): Kundu, K., & Sarkar, D. (2026). Evaluating the effectiveness of the blended learning approach for enriching critical thinking and problem solving in undergraduate students. Shodh Sari – An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 5(3), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.59231/SARI7940

Chicago Style: Kundu, Kakali, and Debabrata Sarkar. 2026. “Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Blended Learning Approach for Enriching Critical Thinking and Problem Solving in Undergraduate Students.” Shodh Sari – An International Multidisciplinary Journal 5, no. 3 (July): 3–9. https://doi.org/10.59231/SARI7940.

MLA Style (9th Edition): Kundu, Kakali, and Debabrata Sarkar. “Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Blended Learning Approach for Enriching Critical Thinking and Problem Solving in Undergraduate Students.” Shodh Sari – An International Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 05, no. 03, 2026, pp. 3–9, doi:https://doi.org/10.59231/SARI7940.

Page Numbers: 3–9

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59231/SARI7940

Subject: Education / Higher Education / Educational Technology / Teaching-Learning Methodologies

Received: January 12, 2026

Accepted: April 30, 2026

Published: July 01, 2026

Thematic Classification: Higher Education, Blended Learning, Educational Technology, Undergraduate Pedagogy, Quasi-Experimental Research, Academic Achievement, Critical Thinking, Problem-Solving Skills, Teaching-Learning Methodologies, Faculty Development.

Introduction

Presently education system is move through a transitional phase. It explores to respond to quick expansion and the growing demand for students active learning. Educational institutions are also adopting new technologies and innovative teaching-learning strategies. These strategies aim to provide quality education for all stakeholders. However, due to limited budgets, infrastructure, and the continued importance of face-to-face interaction for encouraging meaningful learning, traditional teaching methods are important. So, both traditional and ICT-supported teaching-learning approaches are used together and this system also influenced learners’ perceptions. Blended learning method preference reflects a learning environment where students appreciate direct guidance from teachers. It also recognizing the role of technology for promoting critical thinking and problem-solving skills. ICT-supported knowledge encourages students to analyse information, investigate multiple perspectives, and apply knowledge to real-life situations, whereas traditional classroom supports interaction supports discussion, reflection, and instant feedback. Altogether these approaches generate a great chance for learners to develop higher-order thinking skills (HOT) essential for academic success and lifelong learning.

Blended Learning is a learning technique where many transmittals mode were being used with the aims of optimizing the learning result and outflow of program delivery. The term “Blended learning” is being frequently used for academic as well as corporate circles. The most significant developments of the 21st century is Blended learning in terms of teaching learning process. This approach incorporates and combines the strengths of face-to-face and online learning system.

The ICT-supported teaching and learning process is a very good choice for reduction of pedagogical errors, quality education, increasing student exposures, and aligning their knowledge with current technological advancements and globalization. This strategy gives the teaching learning process a new dimension, introduces students to a wide pool of knowledge, and opens countless opportunities towards learn, unlearn, and relearn. Long ago Swami Vivekananda truly said that schools should reach out to people if they cannot reach them. The same is true of ICT-supported learning.

The term critical comes from the Greek word Kritios meaning able to judge. Critical thinking is a kind of thinking in which individuals will be able to question, analyse, interpret, evaluate and make a judgement about what you read, hear and express your emotions. 

In another hand Problem solving skills refer to an individual’s capacity to engage in cognitive processing to understand and resolve situations where a method or solution is not immediately obvious.

Objectives of the study:

    The objectives of the present study are the following:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of blended learning for teaching education in terms of achievement.  

  • To compare the traditional teaching method and Blended learning approach.

Hypothesis of the study:

  1. The hypothesis is set as no significant change will occur due to the blended learning approach.

  2. It was expected that there would be no significant difference in academic achievement.

Research methodology: 

For this study, a quasi-experimental method was used to evaluate the effectiveness of blended learning method in improving critical thinking and problem-solving skills among undergraduate students. Selected subjects were equally divided into two groups: control group and an experimental group. The control group has got traditional teaching method, and the experimental group received blended learning approach that integrated face-to-face and technology-mediated learning experiences.

Sampling: For the present study, 120 (one hundred and twenty) undergraduate standard students were selected from three government-undertaken colleges of North 24 Parganas district, West Bengal. Where students were selected from each college who have opted education subject one of the elective subjects.

 Tools and Techniques: For the purpose of the study, two tools are used.  Firstly, a Blended learning approach was prepared based on lesson plan for teaching. Secondly, an achievement test was prepared by the researchers in consider with Education for 20 marks. Pre-test and post-test data were collected to measure students ‘achievement before and after the teaching. For data analysis, mean, standard deviation (S.D.) and t-test were used.

Data Analysis and Interpretation:

Table 1

Effectiveness of Blended learning approach on achievement in Education

Group

Test

N

Mean

SD

t-value

Experimental Group

Pre-test

60

45.20

6.80

18.74

Post-test

60

68.90

7.20

Table 1 shows that the obtained t-value is 18.74; the analysis shows that the Blended Learning approach produced a highly significant and increases academic achievement. The post-test mean is higher than the pre-test means, and its prediction about the benefits of blended learning approaches. T-test result shows that the computed t-value (t=18.74, Df=59) is higher than the t-value at the 0.01 level. Therefore, the difference between pre-test and post-test mean scores is statistically significant.

Table 2

Pre-test Comparison between the Experimental group and Control group 

Group

N

Mean

SD

Control Group 

60

46.80

6.90

Experimental Group

60

47.10

7.10

Df = 59, t-value = 0.23

Group

N

Mean

SD

t-value

Experimental Group (blended learning)

60

74.60

6.80

10.31

Control Group (traditional teaching)

60

61.40

7.20

Table no 2 shows that the pre-test mean of the experimental group (m= 47.10, SD= 7.10) and the control group (m= 46.80, SD= 6.90) did not show significant differences. T-test result also suggesting similar result (t value = 0.23). This confirms that both groups were academically equivalent at beginning.

Table 3

Post-test Comparison for Experimental group and Control 

Table 3 shows that mean and SD value for experimental group is m=74.60, SD=6.80 and control group is m=61.40, SD=7.20. This shows that the Blended Learning approach outperformed to the traditional teaching method. The computed t-value of 10.31 exceeds the critical t-value at 0.01 level. This shows that statistically significant difference in academic achievement between the two groups and Experimental group is demonstrated better academic achievement in comparison with the control group.

Findings of the study: 

The conclusions were made after a thorough examination and interpretation. These are: 

  1. Blended learning approach has a considerable influence on students’ academic achievement.

  2. Data analysis confirms that both the experimental and control group initially performed similarly, but whenever Blended learning approach was exposed, differences were shown clearly. In this regard Blended learning approach is more effective than the traditional teaching method in enhancing academic achievement.

Conclusion:

Blended learning, as hybrid instructional approach, continuously evolving with developing age of digital technology and shift in learning framework. Future world is expecting to focus on the seamless assimilation with emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, augmented and virtual reality and adaptive learning system. These approaches have the capability to create more personalized, mutual and energetic teaching learning environment that provide facilities to diver’s student needs. Here are some key scopes to watch:

Application of AI: AI is expected to revolutionise blended learning by providing a more personalised and adaptive learning experience. AI can analyse student performance, predict learning needs and modify educational content to individual preferences.

AR and VR experiences: virtual realities and augmented realities allow students to explore experiential learning opportunities that also may go beyond traditional methods, which can learning more engaging and enjoyable.

Data analytics: Various data analysis tools help to identify trends and patterns. This may enable educators to track the performance of students, and by understanding students’ challenges and needs. In this regard, institutions can also provide more facilities and support.

Focus on learning throughout life: Blended learning offers courses and training programs that help professionals acquire new skills and refine them, and learners can pursue additional certifications, qualifications and courses that align with their career advancement.

Educationalists and teachers should encourage students to be creative, so that students can think critically and develop problem solving skill. To facilitate this transition, teachers should arrange more faculty development programme and seminars and orientation programme focused on the blended learning approach.

Statements & Declarations

Peer-Review Method: This article underwent a double-blind peer-review process involving external experts in the fields of Education, Instructional Technology, and Pedagogy. 

Competing Interests: The authors Kakali Kundu and Debabrata Sarkar declare that they have no competing interests, financial or otherwise, that could have influenced the outcomes of this research. 

Funding: This research received no external funding or grants from any commercial, private, or non-profit sectors. 

Data Availability: The quasi-experimental datasets, statistical values, and pedagogical frameworks analyzed in this study are available within the tables and sections of the article. Any additional raw pre-test or post-test student score matrices are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. 

Licence: Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Blended Learning Approach for Enriching Critical Thinking and Problem Solving in Undergraduate Students © 2026 by Kakali Kundu and Debabrata Sarkar is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. This work is published by ICERT. 

Ethics Approval: As this study focused on academic performance evaluation within undergraduate elective courses, it did not involve medical, clinical, or animal experimentation. The quasi-experimental research was conducted with student groups across government-undertaken colleges in accordance with educational research guidelines and institutional norms of Adamas University and contributing institutions. 

Authors’ Contributions: Kakali Kundu (Research Scholar) was responsible for conceptualizing of the topic, contributed to the experimental phase of the study including conducting the experiment, data collection, compilation of the review of related literature, and preparation of the research report and manuscript. Dr. Debabrata Sarkar (Assistant Professor) was responsible for planning of the experimental design, data filtering and analysis, and preparation of the research report and manuscript.

References
  1. Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. The Sloan Consortium. http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/blended06

  2. Alexander, S., & McKenzie, J. (1998). An evaluation of information technology projects for university learning. Committee for University Teaching and Staff Development and the Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs. http://jite.org/documents/Vol5/v5p235-249Heinze156.pdf

  3. Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2006). The handbook of blended learning environments: Global perspectives, local designs. Pfeiffer.

  4. Dangwal, K. L. (2004). Computers in teaching and learning. Shree Vinod Pustak Mandir.

  5. Van Duzer, J. (2002). Instructional design tips for online learning. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blended_learning

  6. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

  7. Harel Caperton, I. (2012). Learning to make games for impact. The Journal of Media Literacy, 59(1), 28–38.

  8. Interactive Learning Centers announces name change to EPIC Learning. (1999, March 5). The Free Library. Retrieved October 18, 2013, from http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Interactive+Learning+Centers+Announces+Name+Change+to+EPIC+Learning.-a054024665

  9. Jacob, A. M. (2011). Benefits and barriers to the hybridization of schools. Journal of Education Policy, Planning and Administration, 1(1), 61–82.

  10. Jara, M., & Mohamad, F. (2007). Pedagogical templates for e-learning. WLE Centre. http://www.wlecentre.ac.uk

  11. Gosper, M., Green, D., McNeill, M., Phillips, R. A., Preston, G., & Woo, K. (2008). Final report: The impact of web-based lecture technologies on current and future practices in learning and teaching. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. http://mq.edu.au/ltc/altc/wblt/docs/report/ce6-22_final2.pdf

  12. Prantosh, K. P., Dipak, C., & Kumar, A. (2012). E-learning: New age knowledge model delivery through advance information technology and cloud computing: An overview. BRICS International Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 22–25.

  13. Alexander, S. (2010). Flexible learning in higher education. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 441–447). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00868-X

  14. Kundu, K., & Sarkar, D. (2026). Effectiveness of experiential learning approach for teaching education in higher secondary school. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 5(1), 398–408. https://doi.org/10.59231/SARI7907

Scroll to Top